|
KMID : 0378619920090010089
|
|
Baptist Hospital Medical Journal
1992 Volume.9 No. 1 p.89 ~ p.95
|
|
|
Comparision of Ketamine Versus propofol for Intravenous Anesthesia Undergoing Dilatation and Currettage in the Gynecological Patients
|
|
김재곤
권병연/이상목/류한업
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Intravenous anesthesia of propofol was compared with ketamine on 20 gynecological patients undergoing dilatation and currettage. The patients were randomly assigned to study in two treatment groups so that 10 patients was administered ketamine
anesthesia and 10 patients was administered propofol anesthesia. The hemodynamic responses and recovery characteristics of the two groups were compared with control group. Arterial blood pressure (systolic, mean, diastolic) and heart rate after
induction were significantly increased in ketamine group, but showed significantly decrease in propofol group (table 5). Time to full recovery (mean±SD) was significantly less in the propofol group (14.3±2.9min vs 40.2±4.1min, P<0.01) (table
4).
The authors conclude that intravenos anesthesia of propofol is a pratical alternative technique for gynecological patients undergoing dilatation and currettage and may be preferable to ketamine because of th significantly shorter recovery time.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|